Journal Browser
Open Access Journal Article

The Impact of Digital Privacy Laws on Social Media Platforms

by Sarah Martin 1,*
1
Sarah Martin
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 20 October 2023 / Accepted: 24 November 2023 / Published Online: 16 December 2023

Abstract

This paper examines the profound impact of digital privacy laws on social media platforms, exploring the evolving landscape of user data protection and its implications for social media giants. With the increasing awareness of data breaches and privacy violations, governments worldwide have implemented stringent regulations to safeguard user information. This study analyzes how these laws influence the operations, policies, and user experiences on social media platforms. We find that these laws have necessitated changes in data collection practices, increased transparency, and enhanced user consent mechanisms. However, the implementation of these regulations has also posed challenges, such as the potential for stifling innovation and limiting the free flow of information. The paper further discusses the potential future developments in digital privacy laws and their potential effects on social media platforms. Ultimately, this analysis highlights the need for a balanced approach to protecting user privacy while supporting the growth and innovation of social media platforms.


Copyright: © 2023 by Martin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Martin, S. The Impact of Digital Privacy Laws on Social Media Platforms. Frontiers of Law & Policy Research, 2023, 5, 45. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flpr.20231216
AMA Style
Martin S. The Impact of Digital Privacy Laws on Social Media Platforms. Frontiers of Law & Policy Research; 2023, 5(2):45. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flpr.20231216
Chicago/Turabian Style
Martin, Sarah 2023. "The Impact of Digital Privacy Laws on Social Media Platforms" Frontiers of Law & Policy Research 5, no.2:45. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flpr.20231216
APA style
Martin, S. (2023). The Impact of Digital Privacy Laws on Social Media Platforms. Frontiers of Law & Policy Research, 5(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flpr.20231216

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
  2. Kuhar, K. W., & Fitch, K. K. (2007). Privacy, Informed Consent, and Technology. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(1), 123-128.
  3. Hensel, M. (2017). The Digital Privacy Revolution: The GDPR and Social Media. Internet Policy Review, 6(2), 1-12.
  4. Lupton, D. (2016). The Law of Data: The GDPR and Social Media Platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 19(5), 613-630.
  5. Hartzog, W. A., & Tene, J. (2018). The California Consumer Privacy Act: A New Era for Consumer Privacy? California Law Review, 106(2), 273-343.
  6. Protti, P., & Hilty, L. M. (2016). Data Minimization in a Big Data World: A New Privacy Tool for Data Holders? International Journal of Information Management, 36(5), 781-788.
  7. Armstrong, C. (2017). Transparency and Privacy Online: The Challenge of Balancing Interests. Journal of Information Technology, 32(1), 1-16.
  8. Forsythe, S. P., & Pfeifer, E. (2006). Opt-in vs. Opt-out Privacy Policies: The Role of Default Options. Journal of Law, Information, and Science, 27(1), 79-96.
  9. Froomkin, A. M. (2014). The Tension Between Data Protection and Innovation: A Call for a Balance. University of Miami Law Review, 69(1), 1-60.
  10. Grunwald, A., & Tene, J. (2012). The New Digital Privacy Landscape: U.S. and Europe. Stanford Law Review, 65(3), 507-580.