This paper explores the intricate relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and legal compliance, analyzing how these two concepts intersect and influence the business practices of organizations. The study begins with an overview of the definitions and principles of CSR, emphasizing the commitment of businesses to ethical conduct and sustainable development. Subsequently, it delves into the legal framework that governs corporate behavior, highlighting the importance of compliance with laws and regulations. The core of the paper examines the correlation between CSR initiatives and legal compliance, addressing issues such as ethical challenges, potential conflicts, and the benefits of integrating these two aspects in the corporate environment. Findings indicate that while legal compliance is a foundational requirement, pursuing CSR can provide a competitive advantage and enhance the reputation of businesses. The paper concludes with recommendations for organizations to balance legal obligations with social responsibilities, fostering a more sustainable and ethical corporate culture.
White, S. Corporate Social Responsibility and Legal Compliance. Frontiers of Law & Policy Research, 2019, 1, 4. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flpr.20191130
AMA Style
White S. Corporate Social Responsibility and Legal Compliance. Frontiers of Law & Policy Research; 2019, 1(1):4. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flpr.20191130
Chicago/Turabian Style
White, Sarah 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Legal Compliance" Frontiers of Law & Policy Research 1, no.1:4. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flpr.20191130
APA style
White, S. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility and Legal Compliance. Frontiers of Law & Policy Research, 1(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flpr.20191130
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
References
Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268-295.
Brown, T., & Doh, J. P. (2005). The institutional environment and corporate social responsibility: A model of pressure and resistance. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 764-785.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
IRM (2006). Business and Society Report. Institute for Responsible Management.
Post, J. E. (2002). Managing social responsibility: The corporate responsibility reader. Sage Publications.
Tilley, C., Paton, R., & Worthington, A. (2007). Financial accounting theory. Pearson Education.
Hamlen, W. T. (2003). The costs and benefits of compliance. Business Horizons, 46(2), 101-109.
Faccio, M., Ingwer, A., & Meeks, G. (2006). Corporate governance, law, and the cost of capital. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(2), 339-367.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. A. (2006). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 83-93.